At page 60 holding that court of appeals should not have reached issue because Respondent “did not raise it in the trial court or brief it on appeal9 citing cases
- Sidney & Shatika Davis v. Homeowners of Am. Ins. Co., No. 05-21-00092-CV (Tex. App.—Dallas May 31, 2023).Co. v. Cudd Pressure Control, Inc., 271 S.W.3d 228, 236 (Tex. 2008) (“It is of course true that an appellate court cannot reverse on a ground an appellant has never raised.”); Banda v. Garcia, 955 S.W.2d 270, 272 (Tex. 1997) (per curiam) (…
- in Re Diana Polanco Garza, No. 13-18-00226-CV (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi May 16, 2019).P. 166a(c); Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Murphy, 458 S.W.3d 912, 916 (Tex. 2015) (observing that it is improper for courts of appeals to address issues not raised at trial or briefed on appeal); Garcia v. Robinson, 817 S.W.2d 59, 60 (Tex. 199…
- Mark Lesher & Rhonda Lesher v. Charlie Doescher, Pat Doescher, Apache Iron Metal & Auto Salvage, Inc. D/B/A Apache Truck & Van Parts, Gerald Coyel (Aka Jerry Coyel) in His Individual Capacity & D/B/A Apache Truck & Van Parts, & Shannon Coyel, No. 02-12-00360-CV (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Oct. 10, 2013).(Bolivia), Inc. v. Bechtel Corp., 28 S.W.3d 64, 68 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 7 2000, no pet.) (citing Garcia v. Robinson, 817 S.W.2d 59, 60 (Tex. 1991)); see Beckner v. Stoutimore, No. 02-09-00399-CV, 2010 WL 2636122 , at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Wor…
- Irma Cooper A/K/A Erma Cooper v. Lee Nick McFadin, Jr. D/B/A a & M Inv., a & M Invesments, a & M Heritage Holdings, Inc., a & M Heritage Holdings, Ltd., Heritage Holdings, L.L.C., & C. Harding, Substitute Tr., No. 02-06-00173-CV (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Aug. 24, 2007).Co. v. Mex-Tex, Inc. , 150 S.W.3d 423, 427 (Tex. 2004); Garcia v. Robinson , 817 S.W.2d 59, 60 (Tex. 1991); Robertson v. Sw.
- Kenneth Eugene Guynes v. Texas Bd. of Pardons & Paroles & the Texas Dep't of Crim. Just.-Admin., No. 03-99-00767-CV (Tex. App.—Austin May 18, 2000).App. P. 33.1; Garcia v. Robinson , 817 S.W.2d 59, 60 (Tex. 1991).
- in the Interest of A.L.R., a Child, No. 21-0658 (Tex. June 17, 2022).(holding that court of appeals should not have reached issue because Respondent “did not raise it in the trial court or brief it on appeal)
- Madhavan A. Pisharodi, M.D., P.A. v. United Biologics, L.L.C, No. 04-18-00324-CV (Tex. App.—San Antonio Mar. 25, 2020).See Garcia v. Robinson, 817 S.W.2d 59, 60 (Tex. 1991). -4- 04-18-00324-CV The trial court granted United Biologics’s motion, and Pisharodi argues the trial court erred by rejecting each of its four defenses.
- Bunton v. Bentley, 176 S.W.3d 18 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2003).(Court of appeals should not reach issue not raised in the trial court or briefed on appeal.)
- Schexnider v. Scott & White Mem'l Hosp., 906 S.W.2d 659 (Tex. App.—Austin 1995).See Garcia v. Robinson, 817 S.W.2d 59, 60 (Tex.1991).
Other citing cases
- Aluminum Chemicals (Bolivia), Inc. v. Bechtel Corp., 28 S.W.3d 64 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2000).
- Metromarketing Servs., Inc. v. HTT Headwear, Ltd., 15 S.W.3d 190 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000).
- Long v. NCNB-Texas Nat'l Bank, 882 S.W.2d 861 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1994).
v.
Edward and Sandra ROBINSON
ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.Under common law, a creditor’s acceptance of a check bearing the notation “in full payment” or similar language operates as an accord and satisfaction. See Industrial Life Insurance Co. v. Finley, 382 S.W.2d 100, 106 (Tex.1964). Petitioner Ramon Garcia asks us to decide whether Tex. Bus. & Com.Code § 1.207 abrogates this common-law rule. The court of appeals held that it does, and reversed summary judgment in favor of Garcia. 804 S.W.2d 238. The court of appeals should not have reached this issue, however, because the Robinsons did not raise it in the trial court or brief it on appeal. See Tex.R.Civ.P. 166a(c); Vawter v. Garvey, 786 S.W.2d 263 (Tex.1990). We neither approve nor disapprove of the court of appeals’ discussion or resolution of this question.
Although the court of appeals decided the case on improper grounds, there is no reversible error in its judgment. Accordingly, we deny both parties’ applications for writ of error.