Lloyd R. Edick v. United States, 264 F.2d 229 (6th Cir. 1959). · Go Syfert
Search
Lloyd R. Edick v. United States, 264 F.2d 229 (6th Cir. 1959). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Edmonds v. Floyd (mied, 2020-01-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Edmonds v. Floyd
E.D. Mich. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Edick v. United States, 264 F. 2d 229, 229 (6th Cir. 1959).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lloyd R. EDICK, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
13634_1.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Feb 14, 1959.
264 F.2d 229
Roy Cook, Kansas City, Kan., for appellant., Fred W. Kaess, Donald F. Welday, Jr., U. S. Attys., Detroit, Mich., for appellee.
Martin, Mathes, Per Curiam, Shelbourne.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the briefs and the record in the cause. Whereupon, the United States Attorney admitted that appellant had been denied effective assistance of counsel, within the requirement of the Sixth Amendment, upon arraignment and upon the entry of a guilty plea, and it appearing that the action of the United States Attorney in this respect was in consonance with appropriate authority.

The judgment of the United States District Court, in denying the motion of appellant to vacate sentence pronounced upon him, is directed to be set aside and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.