green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Aubrey Wharton
See Foreman v. United States, 106 U.S. App.D.C. 24, 268 F.2d 899 (1959) ; State v. Cooper, 273 N.C. 51 , 159 S.E.2d 305, 309 (1968) ; Commonwealth v. Kendrick, 351 Mass. 203 , 218 N.E.2d 408, 414 (1966) ; Etter v. State, 185 Tenn. 218 , 205 S.W.2d 1 (1947) ; I F. Wharton, Criminal Law and Procedure § 274 (R.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rollan
v.
FOREMAN, Sr., Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
v.
FOREMAN, Sr., Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
15007_1.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Jun 25, 1959.
Mr. Arthur E. Neuman, Washington, D. C. (appointed by the District Court), for appellant., Mr. William W. Greenhalgh, Asst. U. S. Atty., for appellee. Messrs. Oliver, Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Carl W. Belcher and Edward C. O’Connell, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief for appellee.
Miller, Fahy, Danaher.
Published
PER CURIAM.
Rollan V. Foreman, Sr., was convicted of manslaughter. He was the caretaker of a cemetery and fired his gun toward certain small boys who were intruders. A nine-year-old lad was killed.
We have carefully considered his points on appeal but find no error.
Affirmed.