Robert Elliott v. United States, 270 F.2d 915 (D.C. Cir. 1959). · Go Syfert
Search
Robert Elliott v. United States, 270 F.2d 915 (D.C. Cir. 1959). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1962 · …a confession made during a period of necessary delay in arraignment is not inadmissible because that period was followed by a period of unnecessary delay. ⚠ not in text
43 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tommie A. Johnson v. United States of America, Leon Stewart v. United States (cadc, 1964-11-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Tommie A. Johnson v. United States of America, Leon Stewart v. United States
D.C. Cir. · 1964 · signal: cf. · confidence medium
Cf. Lockley v. United States, 106 U.S. App.D.C. 163, 166-68, 270 F.2d 915, 919-921 (1959) (Burger, J., dissenting); Tate v. United States, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 13 , 283 F.2d 377 (1960).
examined Cited as authority (rule) Ronald R. Brown v. United States (4×)
D.C. Cir. · 1964 · confidence medium
See Bailey v. United States, 117 U.S. App.D.C. 241, 328 F.2d 542, 543-544 (1964) (also quoting Walder to the same effect); Lockley v. United States, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 163 , 167, 270 F.2d 915, 919 (1959) (dissenting opinion; same).
discussed Cited "see" Poe v. United States
D.D.C. · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See the dissenting opinion in Lockley v. United States, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 163 , 167, 270 F.2d 915, 919 (1959), where Judge Burger, author of the Tate decision, said: “From the Walder case I would conclude that before inadmissible evi-donee can be used for impeachment, three factors must be present: (1) the defendant must elect to take the stand, (2) his testimony which conflicts with the inadmissible statements must do more than merely deny the elements of the crime for which he is *177 being tried, and (3) the inadmissible statements should be received only to the extent that they do not adm…
discussed Cited "see" Frank A. Tate v. United States
D.C. Cir. · 1960 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lockley v. United States, 1959, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 163 , 270 F.2d 915 (dissent); Starr v. United States, 1958, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 91 , 264 F.2d 377 , certiorari denied 1959, 359 U.S. 936 , 79 S.Ct. 652 , 3 L.Ed.2d 639 .
examined Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Peter Columbus Curry, Jr. (4×)
2d Cir. · 1966 · signal: see also · confidence medium
See also Lockley v. United States, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 163 , 270 F.2d 915, 918 (1959) (dissenting opinion).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Wilson M. Smith, Jr. v. United States of America, Raymond Bowden v. United States (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1963 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Lockley v. United States, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 163 , 166, 270 F.2d 915 , 918 (1959) (dissenting opinion); see also Barkley v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. -, 323 F.2d 804 , p. 805 (1963) n. 1.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert Elliott
v.
United States
14885_1.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Jun 11, 1959.
270 F.2d 915
1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3703
Published

270 F.2d 915

Robert ELLIOTT, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 14885.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued June 2, 1959.

Decided June 11, 1959.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; Alexander Holtzoff, Judge.

Mr. Carroll F. Tyler, Jr., Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Mr. Harry T. Alexander, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Mr. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Mr. Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before PRETTYMAN, Chief Judge, and DANAHER and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

[*~915]1

This appeal is from conviction on three counts of robbery and one count of carrying a pistol without a license. We find no error.

[*~920]2

Affirmed.