Keco Indus., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 271 F.2d 263 (6th Cir. 1959). · Go Syfert
Search
Keco Indus., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 271 F.2d 263 (6th Cir. 1959). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
KECO INDUSTRIES, INC., Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent
13746_1.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Oct 22, 1959.
271 F.2d 263
1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4714
Steer, Strauss & Adair, Cincinnati, Ohio, argued by Robert J. White, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner., Thomas J. McDermott, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D. C., argued by Christopher J. Hoey, Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Martin, Cecil, Weick.
Published
PER CURIAM.

This case today heard, upon the oral arguments and briefs of the parties, and considered upon the entire record in the case, comes before us on petition of Keco Industries, Inc., for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board amending its earlier order. The labor[*264] board has prayed a decree enforcing its amended order in full.

We are of opinion that the position of the board is correct. There is ample substantial evidence in the record, considered as a whole, to support the findings of fact of the board; and its conclusions of law are reasonably drawn. See 118 N.L.R.B. 317; 121 N.L.R.B. No. 154.

Accordingly, the petition of Keco Industries, Inc., to set aside the amended order of the National Labor Relations Board is denied; and the order of the board, as amended, is directed to be enforced in full.