Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local No. 3887, United Steelworkers of Am., Afl-Cio, 290 F.2d 587 (5th Cir. 1961). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local No. 3887, United Steelworkers of Am., Afl-Cio, 290 F.2d 587 (5th Cir. 1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
LOCAL NO. 3887, UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Respondent
18706.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
May 19, 1961.
290 F.2d 587
1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4452
William J. Rains, Atty., Dominick J. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, G. F. Mclnerny, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., for petitioner., Thomas N. Crawford, Jr., Cooper, Mitch, Black & Crawford, Birmingham, Ala., for respondent.
Tuttle, Rives, De Vane.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

In opposing this attempt of the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order prohibiting it from restraining and coercing employees in the exercise of their rights to refrain from participating in a strike, the respondent Union concedes that there was ample evidence to support the Board’s finding of illegal conduct under Section 8(b) (1) (A) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(b) (1) (A), in three of the five instances relied upon. It asserts that there was no evidence to support the finding of illegal conduct as to the remaining two and seeks to have enforcement denied because the proved incidents were infrequent and sporadic.

We find that there was ample evidence in the record to support the findings as to all incidents relied on by the Board, and we think that it follows that the order must be enforced as a matter of law.

Enforcement ordered.