People v. Hannah, 909 N.E.2d 589 (N.Y. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Hannah, 909 N.E.2d 589 (N.Y. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events (39 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. McLaughlin (nyappdiv, 2019-02-01)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. McLaughlin
N.Y. App. Div. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
"Even assuming, arguendo, that the People were required to establish that defendant knowingly or intentionally failed to comply with the requirements of the Sex Offender Registration Act" ( People v Willis , 79 AD3d 1739, 1740 [4th Dept 2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 864 [2011]; see People v Haddock , 48 AD3d 969, 970-971 [3d Dept 2008], lv dismissed 12 NY3d 854 [2009]), we conclude that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People ( see People v Gordon , 23 NY3d 643, 649 [2014]), is legally sufficient to meet that requirement.
discussed Cited "see" People v. Westcott
N.Y. App. Div. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
Our weight of the evidence review “is not limited to a determination of credibility issues; rather, we ‘must [also] consider the elements of the crime, for even if the prosecution’s witnesses were credible their testimony must prove the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt’ ” (People v Dixon, 62 AD3d at 1038 , quoting People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349 [2007]; see People v Hayden, 60 AD3d 1155, 1156 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 854 [2009]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Cecunjanin
N.Y. App. Div. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
While defendant points out that the victim, King and Martin had consumed alcohol throughout the evening and that certain portions of their testimony were inconsistent with their prior statements about the incident, as well as each other’s testimony, both their level of inebriation as well as the inconsistencies in their testimony were thoroughly explored during trial and did not render their testimony “so unworthy of belief as to be incredible as a matter of law” (People v Williams, 46 AD3d 1024, 1026 [2007] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see People v Hayden, 60 AD3d 1…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
HANNAH.
New York Court of Appeals.
May 21, 2009.
909 N.E.2d 589
Published

Application in criminal cases for leave to appeal denied. (Ciparick, J.)