People v. ISIDORE, 849 N.E.2d 978 (N.Y. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. ISIDORE, 849 N.E.2d 978 (N.Y. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
50 citation events (50 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Kuhn (nyappdiv, 2025-10-10)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" People v. Kuhn (3×)
N.Y. App. Div. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention concerning County Court's failure to advise him that he was subject to registration and a risk-level determination under the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq. ; see People v Jackson , 26 AD3d 781, 782 [4th Dept 2006], lv denied 6 NY3d 849 [2006]; People v Ginter , 23 AD3d 1064 , 1065 [4th Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 776 [2006]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Myers
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
The so-called “identity” or “modus operandi” exception is applied only “in limited circumstances” (People v Toland, 284 AD2d 798, 803 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 942 [2001] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]), and requires clear and convincing proof of both “the identity of the defendant as the perpetrator of the prior crimes” and “that the modus operandi of the crimes is so unique as to make the evidence highly probative” (People v Neu, 126 AD2d 223, 225 [1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 652 [1987]; see People v Latimer, 24 AD3d 807, 809 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 849 [20…
discussed Cited "see" People v. Myers
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
The so-called “identity” or “modus operandi” exception is applied only “in limited circumstances” (People v Toland, 284 AD2d 798, 803 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 942 [2001] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]), and requires clear and convincing proof of both “the identity of the defendant as the perpetrator of the prior crimes” and “that the modus operandi of the crimes is so unique as to make the evidence highly probative” (People v Neu, 126 AD2d 223, 225 [1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 652 [1987]; see People v Latimer, 24 AD3d 807, 809 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 849 [20…
discussed Cited "see" People v. Carter
N.Y. App. Div. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
According deference to the jury’s credibility determinations (see People v Bailey, 295 AD2d 632, 634 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 766 [2002]), we find “no basis upon which to determine that the jury failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded” (People v Johnson, 38 AD3d 1012, 1014 [2007]; see People v Hutcherson, 25 AD3d 912, 914 [2006], lv denied 6 NY3d 849 [2006]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. McDuffie
N.Y. App. Div. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
Defendant “ ‘ought not be allowed to take the benefit of the favorable charge and complain about it on appeal’ ” (People v Shaffer, 66 NY2d 663, 665 [1985]; see People v Kearney, 25 AD3d 622, 623 [2006], lv denied 6 NY3d 849 [2006]).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Doyle
N.Y. App. Div. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
These prior incidents, which do reveal a sufficiently distinctive crime pattern, were properly admitted to establish defendant’s motive and identity as the victim’s murderer (see People v Poland, 284 AD2d 798 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 942 [2001]; see also People v Latimer, 24 AD3d 807, 808-809 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 849 [2006]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
ISIDORE.
New York Court of Appeals.
Apr 25, 2006.
849 N.E.2d 978
Published

Application in criminal cases for leave to appeal denied. (Read, J.).