City of New York v. Consol. Edison Co. of New York, Inc., 745 N.E.2d 1011 (N.Y. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
City of New York v. Consol. Edison Co. of New York, Inc., 745 N.E.2d 1011 (N.Y. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: DeMicco Bros. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. (nyappdiv, 2004-06-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" DeMicco Bros. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
In light of defendants’ affirmative legal obligation to remove or alter their wires for public works construction (Administrative Code of City of NY § 24-521; see City of New York v Consolidated Edison Co., 274 AD2d 189 [2000], appeal and lv dismissed 96 NY2d 727 [2001]), we find that plaintiffs allegations permit the inference that defendants’ failure to remove or alter the offending overhead wires was not inadvertent, but rather stemmed from an intentional decision for no legitimate reason, i.e., disinterested malevolence (see Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v Lindner, supra at 33…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of New York, by and on Behalf of the Department of Design and Construction of the City of New York, Respondent,
v.
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Appellant
New York Court of Appeals.
Jan 11, 2001.
745 N.E.2d 1011
2001 N.Y. LEXIS 65
Published

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.