Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. State, 187 N.E.2d 791 (N.Y. 1962). · Go Syfert
Search
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. State, 187 N.E.2d 791 (N.Y. 1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: W.R. Assocs. of Norwalk v. Comm'r, Trans., 751 A.2d 859 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1999)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Humble Oil & Refining Company, Appellant,
v.
State of New York, Respondent
Claim 35662.
New York Court of Appeals.
Dec 31, 1962.
187 N.E.2d 791
1962 N.Y. LEXIS 819
George B. Fearon and Rudolph V. Parr for appellant., Louis J, Lefkowits, Attorney-General (Jean M. Coon and Paxton Blair of counsel), for respondent.
Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster Concur.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

One of the surest guides in measuring damages occasioned by a partial taking of real property is the diminution in rental value resulting from the taking, that is, the difference in value before and after the taking. (See Orgel, Valuation under Eminent Domain [2d ed., 1953], ch. IV, p. 225 ei seq., [*863] particularly §§ 64 — 65, pp. 290-302.) In this case, use of the capitalization method to assess the loss in such rental value — a method not employed by the Appellate Division — demonstrates that the ultimate finding made by that court is supported by the weight of the evidence. (Cf. Matter of Port of N. Y. Auth., 2 N Y 2d 296, 301; Sunnybrook Realty Co. v. State of New York, 9 N Y 2d 960.)

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dte, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster concur.

Judgment affirmed.