People v. Williams, 412 N.E.2d 1320 (N.Y. 1980). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Williams, 412 N.E.2d 1320 (N.Y. 1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Charles Williams, Appellant
New York Court of Appeals.
Oct 9, 1980.
412 N.E.2d 1320
1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2661
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Brent K. Olsson and William E. Hellerstein for appellant., John J. Santucci, District Attorney (William Schrager of counsel), for respondent.
Cooke, Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

There was no error in the People’s cross-examination of defendant’s alibi witnesses with reference to their failure before trial to have come forward with the substance of their exculpatory testimony (People v Dawson, 50 NY2d 311). Nor is there any merit to the assertion that the sentencing court imposed a heavier sentence on defendant because he had chosen to go to trial rather than disposing of his case by plea as did his codefendants. The language of the sentencing court from which defendant would draw that conclusion was no more than a statement that the trial "afforded the Court an opportunity to get the background of the defendant and his involvement with the law” — information which was adverse to defendant and properly taken into account in determining the sentence.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.