Grow v. Hill, 205 P.3d 887 (Or. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
Grow v. Hill, 205 P.3d 887 (Or. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2015–2020 · …an easement is a right in one person to do certain acts on land of another. ⚠ not in text
84 citation events (84 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Moore v. Grabavoy (orctapp, 2026-05-13)
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Moore v. Grabavoy
Or. Ct. App. · 2026 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
an express easement is one expressed clearly in writing containing plain and direct language evincing the grantor's intent to create a right in the nature of an ease- ment.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Partney v. Russell
Or. Ct. App. · 2020 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
an easement is a right in one person to do certain acts on land of another.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) 7455 Inc. v. Tuala Northwest, LLC
Or. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
an easement is a right in one person to do certain acts on land of another.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) FountainCourt Homeowners' Ass'n v. FountainCourt Development, LLC
Or. Ct. App. · 2014 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
if a proposed interpretation would require us to disregard any provision of the policy, it is not reasonable, as a matter of law.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Cascade Pacific Pulp, LLC v. Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP
Or. Ct. App. · 2013 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the interpretation of an express easement is a question of law for the court.
discussed Cited "see" Taylor v. SAIF
Or. Ct. App. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See OEA v. Oregon Taxpayers United, 253 Or App 288, 302 , 291 P3d 202 (2012) (Generally speaking, “the law of the case doctrine ‘precludes relitigation or reconsideration of a point of law decided at an earlier stage of the same case.’ ” (quoting Bloomfield v. Weakland, 224 Or App 433, 440 , 199 P3d 318 (2008), rev den, 346 Or 115 (2009) (emphasis in OEA)); Kennedy v. Wheeler, 356 Or 518, 531 , 341 P3d 728 (2014) (“The term ‘law of the case’ is best reserved for use in the context in which a party seeks to relitigate an appellate decision.”).
discussed Cited "see" Taylor v. SAIF
Or. Ct. App. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See OEA v. Oregon Taxpayers United, 253 Or App 288, 302 , 291 P3d 202 (2012) (Generally speaking, “the law of the case doctrine ‘precludes relitigation or reconsideration of a point of law decided at an earlier stage of the same case.’ ” (quoting Bloomfield v. Weakland, 224 Or App 433, 440 , 199 P3d 318 (2008), rev den, 346 Or 115 (2009) (emphasis in OEA)); Kennedy v. Wheeler, 356 Or 518, 531 , 341 P3d 728 (2014) (“The term ‘law of the case’ is best reserved for use in the context in which a party seeks to relitigate an appellate decision.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Martinez
Or. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Funkhouser v. Wells Fargo Corp., 224 Or App 308, 313 , 197 P3d 592 (2008), rev den, 346 Or 115 (2009) (sick leave is a vested right when the employment agreement creating the right so provides).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Martinez (2×)
Or. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Funkhouser v. Wells Fargo Corp., 224 Or.App. 308, 313 , 197 P.3d 592 (2008), rev. den., 346 Or. 115 , 205 P.3d 887 (2009) (sick leave is a vested right when the employment agreement creating the right so provides).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GROW
v.
HILL.
S056900.
Oregon Supreme Court.
Mar 26, 2009.
205 P.3d 887
Published
4 passages pin-cited by 5 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 89%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Oregon (4)

Petition for review denied.