Makas v. Every, 667 N.E.2d 336 (N.Y. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Makas v. Every, 667 N.E.2d 336 (N.Y. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Brackman v. Southern Tier Abstract Corp. (nyappdiv, 2001-12-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Brackman v. Southern Tier Abstract Corp.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
This being the case, and noting the limited standard of review to be applied in small claims cases — “ ‘whether substantial justice has been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law’ ” (id., at 858, quoting Pierce v Pastorello, 255 AD2d 622 ; see, Makas v Every, 224 AD2d 793 , appeal dismissed 88 NY2d 867 ) — we find no basis for concluding that Justice Court’s determination to dismiss the case was clearly erroneous.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tim Makas, Appellant,
v.
Robert Every, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
May 2, 1996.
667 N.E.2d 336
1996 N.Y. LEXIS 710
Published

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601).