green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Eddyville Corp. v. Relyea
Contrary to plaintiffs argument, the record sufficiently indicates that Hallstead and his predecessors “cultivated or improved” plaintiff’s land (RPAPL 522 [1]; see McGuirk v Ferran, 222 AD2d 943 , 945-946 [1995], lv dismissed and denied 88 NY2d 1003 [1996]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tormos v. Hammons
Accordingly, since the ultimate power and responsibility in this administrative scheme lies with State DSS, “[i]imposing responsibility for attorney’s fees on the State DSS takes this structure into account and avoids evasion of responsibility by bureaucratic fingerpointing and red-tape shufflings” (Matter of Thomasel v Perales, 78 NY2d 561, 570 ; see also, Matter of Mitchell v Bane, 218 AD2d 537, 541-542 , lv dismissed 88 NY2d 1003 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Olga McGuirk, Respondent,
v.
Nadia Ferran, Also Known as Nadia Kannes, Et Al., Appellants
v.
Nadia Ferran, Also Known as Nadia Kannes, Et Al., Appellants
New York Court of Appeals.
Sep 10, 1996.
672 N.E.2d 596
1996 N.Y. LEXIS 3029
Published
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division’s December 28, 1995 order as affirmed Supreme Court’s order releasing plaintiff’s undertaking, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying defendants’ motion for reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.