Cook v. Cook, 718 N.E.2d 409 (N.Y. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Cook v. Cook, 718 N.E.2d 409 (N.Y. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Town of Bethlehem (nyappdiv, 2005-03-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Town of Bethlehem
N.Y. App. Div. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
The burden to show that a statute violates due process of law is high; petitioner would have to overcome the strong presumption that the Legislature was “acting in pursuit of permissible State objectives and . . . the means adopted in [Town Law § 195] reasonably related to the accomplishment of those objectives” (Montgomery v Daniels, 38 NY2d 41, 54 [1975]; see Helgans v Plurad, 255 AD2d 554, 555 [1998], appeal dismissed 93 NY2d 882 [1999], lv dismissed and denied 93 NY2d 994 [1999]).
discussed Cited "see" Hilbert v. Sahlen Packing Co.
N.Y. App. Div. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
We note that plaintiff’s alleged internal injuries are not included within the statute’s highly restrictive definition of “‘grave injury’ ”, nor are plaintiff’s alleged fractures and non-total loss of hearing and vision (Workers’ Compensation Law § 11; see generally, Fichter v Smith, 259 AD2d 1023 , lv dismissed in part and denied in part 93 NY2d 994 ).
Arthur Cook, Appellant,
v.
Lovell Cook, Respondent. (And Another Action.)
New York Court of Appeals.
Jul 8, 1999.
718 N.E.2d 409
1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1975
Published

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying appellant’s motion to vacate, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.