Matter of Gridley Bldg., Inc. v. Gingold, 183 N.E.2d 909 (N.Y. 1962). · Go Syfert
Matter of Gridley Bldg., Inc. v. Gingold, 183 N.E.2d 909 (N.Y. 1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
Cited for
11 N.Y.2d at 1031 cited at this page1 citing case
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Gridley Bldg., Inc., Appellant,
v.
Benjamin M. Gingold, as Commissioner of Assessment of the City of Syracuse, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
Jun 12, 1962.
183 N.E.2d 909
1962 N.Y. LEXIS 1090
John Timothy Smith for appellant., Stewart F. Hancock, Jr., Corporation Counsel (George T. Driscoll and Eleanor Theodore of counsel), for respondent.
Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster Concur.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, without costs. Subdivision 1 of section 716 of the Beal Property Tax Law authorizes but one demand as of right for an admission of the percentage of full value at which real property is assessed on the tax rolls of the municipality, which is all that has been determined by the order under review. The taxpayer could not serve a subsequent demand without prior application addressed to the discretion of Special Term for leave to do so, as in the case of a motion for permission to serve an amended or supplemental pleading after the time to serve it as of right has expired (Austin v. Saccacio, 1 AD 2d 1028; Orlik v. National Carbon Co., 176 App. Div. 600). The order appealed from does not preclude the taxpayer from making such an application at Special Term on good cause shown.

Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Fboessel, Van Voobhis, Bubble and Fosteb concur.

Order affirmed.