State v. Williams, 228 P.3d 488 (N.M. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Williams, 228 P.3d 488 (N.M. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Acosta v. Shell Western Exploration & Production, Inc. (nmctapp, 2012-12-26)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Acosta v. Shell Western Exploration & Production, Inc. (2×)
N.M. Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Fuentes, 2010-NMCA-027, ¶ 23 , 147 N.M. 761 , 228 P.3d 1181 (stating that the reliability requirement for the admission of scientific evidence under Daubert implicates the third prerequisite), cert. denied, 2010-NMCERT-002 , 147 N.M. 704 , 228 P.3d 488 . {17} Where essential elements of Plaintiffs’ case are entirely dependent upon expert testimony, the trial judge has a duty to “ensure that an expert’s testimony rests on both a reliable foundation and is relevant to the task at hand so that speculative and unfounded opinions do not reach the jury.” Parkhill v. Alderman-Ca…
discussed Cited "see" Acosta v. Shell W. Expl. & Prod., Inc. (2×)
N.M. Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Fuentes, 2010-NMCA-027, ¶ 23 , 147 N.M. 761 , 228 P.3d 1181 (stating that the reliability requirement for the admission of scientific evidence under Daubert implicates the third prerequisite), cert. denied, 2010-NMCERT-002 , 147 N.M. 704 , 228 P.3d 488 . {17} Where essential elements of Plaintiffs’ case are entirely dependent upon expert testimony, the trial judge has a duty to “ensure that an expert’s testimony rests on both a reliable foundation and is relevant to the task at hand so that speculative and unfounded opinions do not reach the jury.” Parkhill v. Alderman-Ca…
discussed Cited "see" Andrews v. United States Steel Corp. (2×)
N.M. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Fuentes, 2010-NMCA-027, ¶ 23 , 147 N.M. 761 , 228 P.3d 1181 , cert. denied, 2010-NMCERT-002 , 147 N.M. 704 , 228 P.3d 488 (stating that the reliability requirement for the admission of scientific evidence under Daubert implicates the third prerequisite). {13} Where expert testimony concerns scientific knowledge, the proponent of the testimony must establish the reliability of the science and methodology on which it is based.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Dominguez (2×)
N.M. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. 17 Fuentes, 2010-NMCA-027, ¶ 29 , 147 N.M. 761 , 228 P.3d 1181 (filed 2009) 18 (declining to review the defendant’s undeveloped argument), cert. denied, 2010- 19 NMCERT-002, 147 N.M. 704 , 228 P.3d 488 . 6 1 Sufficiency of the Evidence for Counts 1 Through 10 2 Defendant argues that there was insufficient evidence to support a conviction 3 for Counts 1 through 10.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
WILLIAMS.
32,190 (COA 28,131).
New Mexico Supreme Court.
Feb 24, 2010.
228 P.3d 488
2010 N.M. LEXIS 29
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Denials of Certiorari.