Cortley Fabrics Co., Inc. v. Joseph Slifka & Sylvia Slifka, Individually & as Co-Partners D/B/A Slifka Fabrics, & Armory Fabrics, Inc., 317 F.2d 924 (2d Cir. 1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Cortley Fabrics Co., Inc. v. Joseph Slifka & Sylvia Slifka, Individually & as Co-Partners D/B/A Slifka Fabrics, & Armory Fabrics, Inc., 317 F.2d 924 (2d Cir. 1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ideal Toy Corporation v. Fab-Lu, Ltd. (nysd, 1966-12-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ideal Toy Corporation v. Fab-Lu, Ltd. (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
S.D.N.Y. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cortley Fabrics Co. v. Slifka, 175 F.Supp. 66 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 317 F.2d 924 (2d Cir. 1963).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cortley Fabrics Company, Inc.
v.
Joseph Slifka and Sylvia Slifka, Individually and as Co-Partners D/B/A Slifka Fabrics, and Armory Fabrics, Inc.
28116_1.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jun 14, 1963.
317 F.2d 924
Published

317 F.2d 924

CORTLEY FABRICS COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Joseph SLIFKA and Sylvia Slifka, individually and as co-partners d/b/a Slifka Fabrics, and Armory Fabrics, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 394.

Docket 28116.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued June 14, 1963.

Decided June 14, 1963.

Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Richard H. Levet, J., granting summary judgment for the plaintiff in an action for infringement of copyright of a textile design.

Affirmed.

Milton R. Ackman, New York City (John F. Finn, Jr., and Strasser, Spiegelberg, Fried & Frank, New York City, on the brief) for plaintiff-appellee.

Isidore A. Seltzer, New York City (Arnold R. Krakower, New York City, on the brief) for defendants-appellants.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and KAUFMAN and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

We affirm in open court the order of the district court granting summary judgment for the plaintiff in an action for infringement of its copyright of a textile design.

2

See also D.C. 175 F.Supp. 66.