green
Positive treatment
Issue: presumption waiverNM ↗
Issue: district court refused instructionNM ↗
2.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Spencer
See State v. Rivera, 2008-NMSC-056, ¶ 18 , 144 N.M. 836 , 192 11 P.3d 1213 , cert. denied, 2009-NMCERT-005 , 146 N.M. 728 , 214 P.3d 793 . 12 Defendant contends that this issue turns on whether the statements are testimonial. 13 As discussed earlier in this opinion, the district court admitted Officer Duran’s 14 testimony about Mrs. Ortega’s statements not for the truth of the matter asserted, but 15 to show why Officer Duran went to the drawer and recovered the fork.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bowden
Section 66—8—110(E); see also State v. Day, 2008-NMSC-007, ¶ 27 , 143 N.M. 359 , 176 P.3d 1091 (discussing the newly enacted legislation that “specified an outer time limit for a [Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) ] test taken after driving to prove a defendant’s BAC at the time of driving, as required by [the] per se DWI statute”), cert. quashed, 2009-NMCERT-005 , 146 N.M. 728 , 214 P.3d 793 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
JASSO.
v.
JASSO.
31,589 (COA 27,507).
New Mexico Supreme Court.
May 14, 2009.
Published
Writ Quashed.