State v. Powell, 195 P.3d 63 (Or. 2008). · Go Syfert
State v. Powell, 195 P.3d 63 (Or. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
170 citation events (170 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Heard (orctapp, 2025-05-07)
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Heard
Or. Ct. App. · 2025 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
even assuming that the court erred, it is not appro- priate for us to exercise our discretion to review the error;" "had defendant called the argument to the court's attention, it might easily have been remedied
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Heard
Or. Ct. App. · 2025 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
even assuming that the court erred, it is not appro- priate for us to exercise our discretion to review the error;" "had defendant called the argument to the court's attention, it might easily have been remedied
discussed Cited "see" State v. Pierce
Or. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Soto-Nunez, 211 Or App 545, 548-49 , 155 P3d 96 (2007), vac’d on other grounds, 345 Or 316 , 195 P3d 64 (2008) (if defendant had brought the defect in findings to the trial court’s attention, “it might easily have been remedied”).
cited Cited "see" Roman Tatarinov v. Jeff Premo
9th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Williams, 345 Or. 316 , 195 P.3d 64 (2008).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Knuckles v. Commonwealth
Ky. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Vega, 206 Or.App. 668 , 139 P.3d 260 (2006), vacated on other grounds, 345 Or. 316 , 195 P.3d 64 (2008) (discussing the Kanae factors in the context of a delay that occurred midtrial, prior to the beginning of deliberations). 6 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
POWELL.
S056215.
Oregon Supreme Court.
Oct 3, 2008.
195 P.3d 63

Petition for review allowed.