Kenneth E. Ho & Maizie Y. Ho v. United States, 331 F.2d 144 (9th Cir. 1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Kenneth E. Ho & Maizie Y. Ho v. United States, 331 F.2d 144 (9th Cir. 1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McCullough v. City of Billings, 2000 MT 226N
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kenneth E. HO and Maizie Y. Ho, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
18941_1.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Apr 24, 1964.
Published opinion
331 F.2d 144
1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5571
Walter G. Chuck, Yoshio Shigezawa, and Wallace Fujiyama, Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellants., Herman T. F. Lum, U. S. Atty., and T. S. Goo, Asst. U. S. Atty., Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellee.
Chambers, Koelsch, Browning.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The District Court’s finding that Dr. Ho did not have such control over his car as was reasonably required in the circumstances, and that his negligence contributed substantially to the automobile collision out of which this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C.A. § 2671 et seq.) arose, is not clearly erroneous. The trial court did not err (1) in admitting the testimony of witnesses as to the speed at which Dr. IIo’s automobile was traveling, or (2) in denying the motion for a new trial.

Affirmed.