Freeman Ray Stanford v. J. C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, 337 F.2d 176 (10th Cir. 1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Freeman Ray Stanford v. J. C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, 337 F.2d 176 (10th Cir. 1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Williams v. Daggett (ksd, 1974-03-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." Williams v. Daggett
D. Kan. · 1974 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e. g., Stanford v. Taylor, 337 F.2d 176 (10th Cir. 1964), terms of five and two and one-half years; Kelly v. Goodwyn, 239 F.Supp. 269 (E.D.Tex. 1965), terms of five years and one year.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Freeman Ray STANFORD, Appellant,
v.
J. C. TAYLOR, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, Appellee
7783_1.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Oct 9, 1964.
337 F.2d 176
1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4201
Thomas P. Brightwell, Denver, Colo., for appellant., Benjamin E. Franklin, Asst. U. S. Atty., Topeka, Kan. (Newell A. George, U. S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., with him on the brief), for appellee.
Phillips, Pickett, Lewis.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order of the District Court for the District of Kansas denying appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus as insufficient upon its face to entitle petitioner to relief. Petitioner, while serving a five-year sentence, escaped and was subsequently apprehended and sentenced to an additional consecutive sentence of two-and-one-half years for such escape. Given a mandatory release on February 13, 1963, he was returned to custody on September 5, 1963, for violation of the terms of his release, to serve 763 days of good time previously allowed on the aggregated sentences. Asserting that at such time he had completely served his original five-year sentence, he contends that the application of aggregated sentences under 18 U.S.C. § 4161 and the forfeiture of good time under 18 U.S.C. § 4165 are invalidly imposed. This court has consistently held[*177] otherwise. Downey v. Taylor, Warden, 10 Cir., 327 F.2d 660, and cases therein cited; Hoover v. Taylor, Warden, 10 Cir., 334 F.2d 281.

The judgment is affirmed.