William Holland v. United States, 343 F.2d 287 (D.C. Cir. 1964). · Go Syfert
Search
William Holland v. United States, 343 F.2d 287 (D.C. Cir. 1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Soolook v. State, 447 P.2d 55 (Alaska 1968)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 289 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Soolook v. State, 447 P.2d 55 (Alaska 1968).published 2 cites
    Id. at 289 (footnotes omitted). 15 .
Other citing cases3 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William HOLLAND, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
18400.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Dec 18, 1964.
Published opinion
343 F.2d 287
Mr. Francis C. Browne (appointed by this court), Washington, D. C., for appellant., Mr. Jerome Nelson, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. David C. Acheson, U. S. Atty., Frank Q. Nebeker and Paul A. Renne, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee., Mr. Martin R. Hoffmann, Asst. U. S. Atty., also entered an appearance for ap-pellee.
Bazelon, Fahy, Washington, Danaher, Bastían, Burger, Wright, McGowan, Chambers.
Cited by 17 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to file his lodged petition for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED by the court en banc that appellant’s aforesaid motion be granted and the Clerk is directed to file appellant’s lodged petition for rehearing en banc, and on consideration whereof, it is

FURTHER ORDERED by the court en banc that appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

BAZELON, Chief Judge, would grant appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc. .See his dissenting statement in Hardy and Ferguson v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C.-, 343 F.2d 233.

FAHY, Circuit Judge, did not participate in the foregoing order in so far as it pertains to the denial of appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc.

WRIGHT, Circuit Judge, did not participate in the foregoing order.

WILBUR K. MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge, prior to his retirement on October 15, 1964, voted to deny appellant’s aforesaid motion and petition.