green
Positive treatment
published
0.6 score
Cited for
Other citing cases
- Emmanuel v. United States Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 579 F. Supp. 1541 (D.V.I. 1984).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maria JUNCO or Dona M. Junco, A/K/A Maria Paz Sacaluga, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
14998.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Apr 12, 1965.
Published opinion
Robert Goodman, Paterson, N. J., for petitioner., Mema B. Marshall, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.
McLaughlin, Hastie, Smith.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the administrative agency that petitioner should be deported was based on reasonable, substantial and probative evidence; it was neither arbitrary, capricious nor violative of procedural due process. The decision will be affirmed. Bufalino v. Holland, 277 F.2d 270 (3 Cir. 1960), cert. den. 364 U.S. 863, 81 S.Ct. 103, 5 L.Ed.2d 85 (1960).