Mainelli v. Haberstroh, 344 F.2d 965 (3d Cir. 1965). · Go Syfert
Search
Mainelli v. Haberstroh, 344 F.2d 965 (3d Cir. 1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Spence v. Board Of Education Of The Christina School District (ca3, 1986-12-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Spence v. Board Of Education Of The Christina School District
3rd Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mainelli v. Haberstroh, 237 F.Supp. 190, 193 (M.D.Pa.1964), aff'd, 344 F.2d 965 (3d Cir.1965).
cited Cited "see" Spence v. Board of Education of Christina School District
3rd Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mainelli v. Haberstroh, 237 F.Supp. 190, 193 (M.D.Pa.1964), aff’d, 344 F.2d 965 (3d Cir.1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mamie J. Mainelli and Nicholas Mainelli
v.
Alfred Haberstroh and Marie Haberstroh, Individually and Doing Business as Hill Top Rest, Pleasant Mount, Wayne County, Pennsylvania, Mamie J. Mainelli
15157.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
May 20, 1965.
344 F.2d 965
1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5498
Published

344 F.2d 965

Mamie J. MAINELLI and Nicholas Mainelli
v.
Alfred HABERSTROH and Marie Haberstroh, Individually and Doing Business as Hill Top Rest, Pleasant Mount, Wayne County, Pennsylvania, Mamie J. Mainelli, Appellant.

No. 15157.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 7, 1965.

Decided May 20, 1965.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; William J., Nealon, Jr., Judge.

Milford J. Meyer, Meyer, Lasch, Hankin & Poul, Philadelphia, Pa. (Louis A. Fine, Honesdale, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Hugh J. McMenamin, Warren, Hill, Henkelman & McMenamin, Scranton, Pa. (Harvey Gelb, Scranton, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

On review of the record we find no error.

2

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed. D.C., 237 F.Supp. 190.