Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mead Foods, Inc., 353 F.2d 87 (5th Cir. 1965). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mead Foods, Inc., 353 F.2d 87 (5th Cir. 1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Gallenkamp Stores Co. Mercury Distributing Company Acme Quality Paints and F. & G. Merchandising v. National Labor Relations Board, and Retail Clerks Union Local 770, Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. K-Mart, a Division of S. S. Kresge Company v. National Labor Relations Board, and Retail Clerks Union Local 770, Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. Hollywood Hat Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, and Retail Clerks Union Local 770, Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio, Intervenor (ca9, 1968-08-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gallenkamp Stores Co. Mercury Distributing Company Acme Quality Paints and F. & G. Merchandising v. National Labor Relations Board, and Retail Clerks Union Local 770, Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. K-Mart, a Division of S. S. Kresge Company v. National Labor Relations Board, and Retail Clerks Union Local 770, Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. Hollywood Hat Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, and Retail Clerks Union Local 770, Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio, Intervenor
9th Cir. · 1968 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare NLRB v. Mead Foods, Inc., 353 F.2d 87 (5 Cir. 1965), in which the Fifth Circuit rejected speculation as to 'asserted practical difficulties which may arise from having to bargain with two locals rather than one;' see also, Pacific Coast Ass'n of Pulp and Paper Mfrs. v. N.L.R.B., 304 F.2d 760, 765-766 (9 Cir. 1962).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gallenkamp Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
9th Cir. · 1968 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare NLRB v. Mead Foods, Inc., 353 F.2d 87 (5 Cir. 1965), in which the Fifth Circuit rejected speculation as to “asserted practical difficulties which may arise from having to bargain with two locals rather than one;” see also, Pacific Coast Ass’n of Pulp and Paper Mfrs. v. N.L.R.B., 304 F.2d 760, 765-766 (9 Cir. 1962).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
MEAD FOODS, INC., Respondent
22013_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Dec 1, 1965.
353 F.2d 87
1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3806
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. MEAD FOODS, INC., Respondent., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N. L. B. B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Allen M. Hutter, Attys., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner., Jerome W. Johnson, Amarillo, Tex., for respondent, Underwood, Wilson, Sutton, Heare & Berry, Amarillo, Tex., of counsel.
Jones, Gewin, Bell.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Respondent’s drivers, residing in parts of Texas and Oklahoma, chose a Texas local and an Oklahoma local to serve as their joint bargaining representative. Respondent refused to bargain because of the absence of express charter power in the locals to serve as a joint representative, and because of asserted practical difficulties which may arise from having to bargain with two locals rather than one. None of these difficulties have yet come into being because no bargaining has taken place.

The employees made their choice. The locals were certified as the joint representative. Respondent should have bargained. Cf. N. L. R. B. v. National Truck Rental Co., (1957) 99 U.S.App.D.C. 259, 239 F.2d 422; and N. L. R. B. v. Burnett Construction Company, (10 Cir. 1965) 350 F.2d 57.

The order will be enforced.