MatterofAttorneysinViolationofJudiciaryLaw§468-a[Zambelli], 121 A.D.3d 1278 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2014). · Go Syfert
Search
MatterofAttorneysinViolationofJudiciaryLaw§468-a[Zambelli], 121 A.D.3d 1278 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Daniel Peter Sheehan, Respondent
D-69-14.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Oct 16, 2014.
Published opinion
121 A.D.3d 1278
Peters, Lahtinen, Stein, McCarthy, Garry.
Published
Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1971, was suspended by this Court’s order dated September 24, 2009 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (65 AD3d 1447 [2009]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Peters, EJ., Lahtinen, Stein, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur.

Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.