MatterofAttorneysinViolationofJudiciaryLaw§468-a[Sheehan], 121 A.D.3d 1277 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014). · Go Syfert
MatterofAttorneysinViolationofJudiciaryLaw§468-a[Sheehan], 121 A.D.3d 1277 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Elaine L. Layton, Respondent
D-67-14.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Oct 16, 2014.
121 A.D.3d 1277
Peters, Lahtinen, Stein, McCarthy, Garry.
Published
Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1985, was suspended by this Court’s order dated January 30, 2014 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (113 AD3d 1020 [2014]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Peters, EJ., Lahtinen, Stein, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur.

Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.