The Gen. Tire & Rubber Co. v. Isocyanate Prods., Inc. Isocyanate Prods., Inc. v. The Gen. Tire & Rubber Co., 391 F.2d 936 (3d Cir. 1968). · Go Syfert
The Gen. Tire & Rubber Co. v. Isocyanate Prods., Inc. Isocyanate Prods., Inc. v. The Gen. Tire & Rubber Co., 391 F.2d 936 (3d Cir. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The General Tire & Rubber Company
v.
Isocyanate Products, Inc. Isocyanate Products, Inc. v. The General Tire and Rubber Company
16738.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Apr 16, 1968.
Published opinion
391 F.2d 936
1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7296
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

391 F.2d 936

157 U.S.P.Q. 353

The GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
ISOCYANATE PRODUCTS, INC.
ISOCYANATE PRODUCTS, INC.
v.
The GENERAL TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, Appellant.

Nos. 16737, 16738.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued March 22, 1968.
Decided April 16, 1968.

John T. Kelton, Watson, Leavenworth, Kelton & Taggart, New York City (Connolly, Bove & Lodge, Wilmington, Del., Herbert Blecker, Thomas v. Heyman, John F. Banzhaf, III, New York City, Frank C. Rote, Akron Ohio, on the brief), for appellant in both cases (The General Tire and Rubber Co.)

C. Walter Mortenson, Mortenson & Weigel, Wilmington, Del. (Charles A. Weigel, Jr., Washington, D.C., Virgil E. Woodcock, John J. Mackiewicz, Woodcock, Phelan & Washburn, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Isocyanate Products, Inc. and Murphy Body Works, Inc.

Before McLAUGHLIN, FORMAN and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[*~936–938]1

On a full consideration of the arguments of appellant we are satisfied that the district court acted within the allowable range of its discretion. The reasoning expressed in its opinion, reported at 270 F.Supp. 868 (D.Del.1967), fully justifies the conclusion that its discretion was wisely exercised.

[*~937–938]2

The judgment will be affirmed.