United States v. Isaac Call, 401 F.2d 540 (4th Cir. 1969). · Go Syfert
United States v. Isaac Call, 401 F.2d 540 (4th Cir. 1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Isaac CALL, Appellant
12401_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jan 13, 1969.
401 F.2d 540
William H. Murdock, U. S, Atty., for appellee., Franklin Smith, Elkin, N. C., for appellant.
Bryan, Winter, Craven.
Published
PER CURIAM:

This appeal of Isaac Call from his conviction of a conspiracy to violate the Internal Revenue laws relating to distilled spirits, 18 U.S.C. § 371, presents no grounds justifying a reversal of the judgment of the District Court. The evidence is altogether adequate to establish the guilt of the appellant as a complotter, between May and July 1967 in North Carolina, in offenses involving illicit whiskey. We have considered the allegations of errors of the District Court at trial, including Call’s allegation that the District Court erred in permitting cross-examination of certain witnesses in regard to prior convictions of Call, and find no basis for these assignments. See Michelson v. United States, 335 U.S. 469, 69 S.Ct. 213, 93 L.Ed. 168 (1948). There is no occasion for argument on the appeal.

Affirmed.