United States of Am. Ex Rel. Hughley Jenkins, 04514 v. Edward J. Hendricks, Supt. Philadelphia Prisons, Pennsylvania, 405 F.2d 182 (3d Cir. 1968). · Go Syfert
Search
United States of Am. Ex Rel. Hughley Jenkins, 04514 v. Edward J. Hendricks, Supt. Philadelphia Prisons, Pennsylvania, 405 F.2d 182 (3d Cir. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: United States v. Spinner, 180 F.3d 514 (3d Cir. 1999)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 183 indictments charging him with receiving stolen goods, and forgery. He was then sentenced to serve a term of not less than seven months nor more than 23 months.…2 citing casesopening of page *183 (no citing court says what it cites this page for)
  • United States v. Spinner, 180 F.3d 514 (3d Cir. 1999).published
    Jenkins v. Hendricks, 405 F.2d 182, 183 (3d Cir.1968) (same), with United States v. Mathews, 833 F.2d 161, 164 (9th Cir.1987) (asserting that guilty plea “establishes the factual basis for jurisdiction”) (cited in United States v. Parker,…
  • United States v. Robert C. Bentz Ronald T. Ross, Ronald T. Ross, 21 F.3d 37 (3d Cir. 1994).published
    Jenkins v. Hendricks, 405 F.2d 182, 183 (3d Cir.1968) (same) with United States v. Mathews, 833 F.2d 161, 164 (9th Cir.1987) (asserting that guilty plea "establishes the factual basis for jurisdiction”) (cited in United States v. Parker, 8…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America Ex Rel. Hughley JENKINS, 04514, Appellant,
v.
Edward J. HENDRICKS, Supt. Philadelphia Prisons, Pennsylvania
17192.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Dec 18, 1968.
Published opinion
405 F.2d 182
1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4438
Hughley Jenkins, pro se., Welsh S. White and Roger F. Cox, Asst. Dist. Attys., Philadelphia, Pa. (Michael J. Rotko, Asst. Dist. Atty., Chief, Appeals Division, Richard A. Sprague, First Asst. Dist. Atty., Arlen Specter, Dist. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Kalodner, Forman, Stahl.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

In the instant case the relator Jenkins on October 24, 1967, petitioned the District Court for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that he had been deprived by the Pennsylvania courts of his constitutional rights to a “speedy preliminary hearing”; a “speedy trial”; and a prompt disposition of his motion to suppress evidence.

The District Court denied Jenkins’ petition on November 15, 1967 on the ground that there had been a failure to exhaust available state remedies.

The record amply sustains the District Court’s disposition.

Moreover, it appears that subsequent to the District Court’s denial of Jenkins’ petition he entered pleas of guilty in the state court on April 29, 1968 to separate[*183] indictments charging him with receiving stolen goods, and forgery. He was then sentenced to serve a term of not less than seven months nor more than 23 months. Other charges pending against Jenkins were then nol prossed.

It is settled that a plea of guilty waives all nonjurisdietional defects. United States v. Ptomey, 366 F.2d 759 (3 Cir. 1966).

The Order of the District Court will be affirmed.