United States of Am., & v. Victoria Henry, 411 F.2d 1008 (9th Cir. 1969). · Go Syfert
Search
United States of Am., & v. Victoria Henry, 411 F.2d 1008 (9th Cir. 1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Victoria HENRY, Appellant
23734.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
May 2, 1969.
411 F.2d 1008
1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12558
Morton Winkel (argued), Portland, Or., for appellant., Mallory Walker (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Sidney I. Lezak, U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., for plaintiff and appellee.
Chambers, Koelsch, Beeks.
Published
PER CURIAM:

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

The only issue is the constitutionality of the presumptions of 21 U.S.C. § 174 and 26 U.S.C. § 4704(a) which deal with narcotics.

Counsel ably argues his position, but we cannot distinguish his facts in principle from Morgan v. United States, 9 Cir., 391 F.2d 237, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 853, 89 S.Ct. 91, 21 L.Ed.2d 122 (1968), which seems required by Yee Hem v. United States, 268 U.S. 178, 45 S.Ct. 470, 69 L.Ed. 904 (1925).