United States v. Pedro Gonzalez-Carrillo, 411 F.2d 1057 (9th Cir. 1969). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Pedro Gonzalez-Carrillo, 411 F.2d 1057 (9th Cir. 1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
63 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Richared E. Ladue (vt, 2017-04-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Richared E. Ladue
Vt. · 2017 · confidence medium
Cir. 1997) (“While a defendant who chooses to volunteer an unsolicited admission or statement to police before questioning may be held to have waived the protection of that right, the defendant who stands silent must be treated as having asserted it.”); United States v. Lopez, 575 F.2d 681, 684-85 (9th Cir. 1978) (finding plain but harmless error where 12 prosecutor improperly commented on defendant’s failure to explain that shooting was accident); Egger v. United States, 509 F.2d 745, 747 (9th Cir. 1975) (finding harmless error where State’s witness was allowed to testify that defenda…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Otis Lee Fuson v. A.R. Jago (2×)
6th Cir. · 1985 · confidence medium
United States v. Brinson, 411 F.2d 1057, 1060 (6th Cir.1969). 33 (b) Particularized Guarantees of Trustworthiness 34 As noted above, in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , 88 S.Ct. 1620 , 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), the Supreme Court acknowledged the inherently suspect trustworthiness of an unavailable codefendant's confession which implicates the other defendant.
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States of America Ex Rel. Melvin Lee Smith v. Charles J. Rowe and William Klusak
7th Cir. · 1980 · confidence medium
See Minor v. Black, 527 F.2d 1, 3-4 (6th Cir. 1975); United States v. Brinson, 411 F.2d 1057, 1060 (6th Cir. 1969).
examined Cited as authority (rule) United States v. George Agee (4×)
3rd Cir. · 1979 · confidence medium
E. g., United States v. Harp, 536 F.2d 601, 602 (5th Cir. 1976); United States v. Arnold, 425 F.2d 204, 206 (10th Cir. 1970); United States v. Nolan, 416 F.2d 588, 594 (10th Cir.), Cert. denied, 396 U.S. 912 , 90 S.Ct. 227 , 24 L.Ed.2d 187 (1969); United States v. Brinson, 411 F.2d 1057, 1059 (6th Cir. 1969).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Robert Victor Boyer v. Ernest S. Patton
3rd Cir. · 1978 · confidence medium
Compare United States v. Semensohn, 421 F.2d 1206, 1209 (2d Cir. 1970); United States v. Brinson, 411 F.2d 1057, 1060 (6th Cir. 1969); Fowle v. United States, 410 F.2d 48 (9th Cir. 1969); and Johnson v. Patterson, 475 F.2d 1066 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 878 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973), with United States ex rel.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Hale (2×)
SCOTUS · 1975 · confidence medium
Compare United States v. Semensohn, 421 F. 2d 1206, 1209 , (CA2 1970); United States v. Brinson, 411 F. 2d 1057, 1060 (CA6 1969); Fowle v. United States, 410 F. 2d 48 (CA9 1969); and Johnson v. Patterson, 475 F. 2d 1066 (CA10), cert. denied, 414 U. S. 878 (1973), with United States ex rel.
examined Cited "see" James A. Hayton v. Charles Egeler, Warden State Prison of Southern Michigan (4×)
6th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Minor v. Black, supra, 527 F.2d 1 (cross-examination and prosecutor’s arguments dealing with defendant’s silence, between arrest and trial, about an alibi constitutional error in that case), and United States v. Brinson, supra, 411 F.2d 1057 (in direct criminal appeal, cross-examination and prosecutorial argument dealing with defendant’s pretrial silence about exculpatory story constitutional error in that case).
examined Cited "see" John Allen Minor v. Harold E. Black, Superintendent (4×)
6th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
E. g., Deats, supra; Patterson, supra; Bobo, supra; Bennett, supra; see Brinson, supra. The failure of petitioner, or his counsel, to timely object at trial to the admission of, and comment on, pre-trial silence for impeachment, though precluding state appellate review, 478 S.W.2d at 718 , cannot preclude federal habeas cor pus relief in the absence of even a suggestion that such failure, rather than being an inadvertent oversight, 3 was an attempted “deliberate bypass” of state court procedure.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Hayton v. Egeler
E.D. Mich. · 1975 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Brinson, 411 F.2d 1057 (6th Cir. 1969) .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Pedro GONZALEZ-CARRILLO, Defendant-Appellant
23189_1.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Aug 4, 1969.
411 F.2d 1057
Roger M. Hughes, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., Edwin L. Miller, Jr., U. S. Atty., Joseph A. Milchen, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Hamley, Duniway, Byrne.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

The opinion heretofore filed in this case is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted in its place:

Appellant was convicted of violating 21 U.S.C. § 176a. He drove a car across the border from Mexico into the United States. There were 110 bricks of marihuana concealed in the car. Appellant claimed that he did not know that the marihuana was there, and on appeal argues that the evidence is insufficient to support a finding that he did know. We hold that the evidence is sufficient. Rodriguez-Gonzalez v. United States, 9 Cir., 1967, 378 F.2d 256, 259; Aguilar v. United States, 9 Cir., 1966, 363 F.2d 379.

Affirmed.