George Caplan, Solomon Caplan & Albert Caplan, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross v. Clint Johnson, Hazel Johnson v. Underwriters at Lloyds, London, Garnishee-Appellant-Cross, 417 F.2d 781 (5th Cir. 1969). · Go Syfert
Search
George Caplan, Solomon Caplan & Albert Caplan, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross v. Clint Johnson, Hazel Johnson v. Underwriters at Lloyds, London, Garnishee-Appellant-Cross, 417 F.2d 781 (5th Cir. 1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ethicon, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (nysd, 1990-05-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ethicon, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
S.D.N.Y. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Caplan v. Johnson, 414 F.2d 615 (5th Cir.), reh’g denied, 417 F.2d 781 (5th Cir.1969); Colton v. Swain, 358 F.Supp. 859 (N.D.Ill.1973), aff'd, 527 F.2d 296 (7th Cir.1975); Peoria v. Underwriter’s at Lloyd’s London, Unincorporated, 290 F.Supp. 890 (S.D.Ill.1968); Goshen v. Grange Mutual Insurance Co., 120 N.H. 915 , 424 A.2d 822 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
George Caplan, Solomon Caplan and Albert Caplan, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross
v.
Clint Johnson, Hazel Johnson v. Underwriters at Lloyds, London, Garnishee-Appellant-Cross
27147.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Oct 7, 1969.
417 F.2d 781
1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10530
Published

417 F.2d 781

George CAPLAN, Solomon Caplan and Albert Caplan, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross Appellants,
v.
Clint JOHNSON, Hazel Johnson, et al., Defendants,
v.
UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, Garnishee-Appellant-Cross Appellee.

No. 27147.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

October 7, 1969.

B. E. Hendricks, Miami, Fla., Edward B. Hayes, Lord, Bissell & Brook, Chicago, Ill., Hendricks & Hendricks, Miami, Fla., for appellants-cross-appellees.

Paul C. Huck, Miami, Fla., William S. Frates, Larry S. Stewart, Frates, Fay, Floyd & Pearson, Miami, Fla., for appellees-cross-appellants.

Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[*~781]1

On due consideration of the petition of Underwriters at Lloyds, London, appellants and cross appellees, for a rehearing of this Court's order of August 14, 1969 denying their petition for rehearing, and of the objection of George Caplan, Solomon Caplan and Albert Caplan, appellees, to the filing of said petition for rehearing, the petition for rehearing is hereby denied.

[*~782]2

On consideration of the motion of George Caplan, Solomon Caplan and Albert Caplan, appellees, that the Court award reasonable attorney's fees, pursuant to Florida Statute § 627.0127, F.S.A., for services in defending this appeal and for briefing the same in this Court, and of the memorandum of Underwriters at Lloyds, London, appellants, in opposition thereto, the motion is hereby granted and the Court fixes the additional attorney's fees due for services in this Court at the sum of $1,500.