United States v. Arthur Lynn Palmer, 422 F.2d 620 (4th Cir. 1970). · Go Syfert
United States v. Arthur Lynn Palmer, 422 F.2d 620 (4th Cir. 1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Arthur Lynn PALMER, Appellant
12877.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Mar 11, 1970.
Published opinion
422 F.2d 620
1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10343
J. Wiley Brown, Court-appointed counsel, Greenville, S. C., on brief, for appellant., Joseph O. Rogers, Jr., U. S. Atty., and James D. McCoy, III, Asst. U. S. Atty., on brief, for appellee.
Haynsworth, Boreman, Winter.
Published
PER CURIAM:

The defendant was convicted of the interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle upon evidence that the vehicle had been stolen in New York, that the defendant had driven it to Greer, South Carolina, where he attempted to sell it for half its wholesale value, that an attempt had been made to alter the serial number, and that the defendant had claimed that he had purchased the car from a person, who, upon investigation, turned out to be fictitious.

In this appeal the defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to convict. Clearly, there was much more than the minimum necessary to take such a case to the jury. The appeal is quite fruitless and oral argument is unnecessary. The conviction is summarily affirmed.

Affirmed.