Reinoehl v. Hershey, 426 F.2d 815 (9th Cir. 1970). · Go Syfert
Search
Reinoehl v. Hershey, 426 F.2d 815 (9th Cir. 1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Yosemite Park v. United States (cc, 1982-08-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Yosemite Park v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Reinoehl v. Hershey, 426 F.2d 815 (9th Cir. 1970).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Diapulse Corporation Of America v. Food And Drug Administration
2d Cir. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Reinoehl v. Hershey, 426 F.2d 815 (9th Cir. 1970); Attorney General's Memorandum on the Public Information Section of the Administrative Procedure Act, in 20 Ad.L.Rev. 263, 293-95 (1968).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Diapulse Corp. of America v. Food & Drug Administration of the Department of Health, Education & Welfare
2d Cir. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Reinoehl v. Hershey, 426 F.2d 815 (9th Cir. 1970); Attorney General's Memorandum on the Public Information Section of the Administrative Procedure Act, in 20 Ad.L.Rev. 263, 293-95 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Richard L. Reinoehl
v.
Lewis B. Hershey, Director of the Selective Service System, and Raymond D. Palmer, Harry H. Pearce, Clifford A. Fish, and Roland C. Kauth, as Members of Local Board Number 30, Selective Service System of the United States of America
24886_1.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
May 8, 1970.
426 F.2d 815
1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9347
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

426 F.2d 815

Richard L. REINOEHL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lewis B. HERSHEY, Director of the Selective Service System,
and Raymond D. Palmer, Harry H. Pearce, Clifford A. Fish,
and Roland C. Kauth, as members of Local Board Number 30,
Selective Service System of the United States of America,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 24886.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 8, 1970.

Jonathan A. Ater (argued), of Lindsay, Nahstoll, Hart, Dafoe & Krause, Gerald H. Robinson, Nick Chaivoe, Portland, Or., for appellant.

Morton Hollander (argued), Ralph A. Fine, Dept. of Justice, William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., Sidney I. Lezak, U.S. Atty., Jack G. Collins, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, Or., for appellee.

Before WRIGHT and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and BOLDT, District judge.[1]

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to have declared invalid Selective Service System Regulation 32 C.F.R. 1606.57 (1969) and to compel issuance without charge of a copy of his Selective Service file. The district court dismissed the complaint. We affirm.

2

The Regulation provides that before indictment or a habeas corpus proceeding, a registrant or his representative may review the file at the draft board office, and receive a copy by paying one dollar per page, or $5.00 per hour for an employee to monitor the file while the registrant copies the file himself. Post-indictment or post-habeas corpus registrants receive complete copies free of charge. Appellant is not in the latter categories.

3

We hold that 31 U.S.C. 483a (1964 Ed.Supp. IV) does authorize such a charge and that 5 U.S.C. 552 (1964 Ed.Supp. IV) requiring government agencies to make public information available does not change this result.

4

In light of the reasonable alternatives available to the registrant to secure the desired information, we also conclude that the fees are not arbitrary and capricious and do not deprive him of due process or equal protection.

5

Affirmed.

1

The Honorable George H. Boldt, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation