United States of Am., & v. David Russell Robinson, 435 F.2d 555 (9th Cir. 1971). · Go Syfert
Search
United States of Am., & v. David Russell Robinson, 435 F.2d 555 (9th Cir. 1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
David Russell ROBINSON, Appellant
25841.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jan 7, 1971.
435 F.2d 555
Clark A. Barrett (argued), San Mateo, Cal., for appellant., J. Kent Steele (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Crim. Div., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Chambers, Merrill, Kilkenny.
Published
PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Differences from United States v. Stark, 9 Cir., 418 F.2d 901, are not consequential.

Also, we find Chernekoff v. United States, 9 Cir., 219 F.2d 721, relied upon by appellant, to be of no help. In Chernekoff (our requirement on induction that the inductee be ordered to step forward) the service had violated its own definite regulation.

Here Robinson himself deprived the hospital of an opportunity to direct him to do any certain work.