Aetna Ins. Co., a Corp. v. Lorraine Marie Monte, Etc., & Ann Louise Rinehold, Etc., 438 F.2d 529 (9th Cir. 1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Aetna Ins. Co., a Corp. v. Lorraine Marie Monte, Etc., & Ann Louise Rinehold, Etc., 438 F.2d 529 (9th Cir. 1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lorraine Marie MONTE, Etc., and Ann Louise Rinehold, Etc., Defendants-Appellees
23897.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Mar 17, 1971.
438 F.2d 529
1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11321
John K. Stewart, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), J. D. Burdick, of Carroll, Davis, Burdick & McDonough, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., Harold T. Faaland, of Wool, Richardson, Colbert & Shea, San Jose, Cal., for appellees.
Duniway, Carter, Gray.
Published

ORDER

This case is controlled by California state law. On the basis of the following cases, decided after the decision below— viz., Herzog v. National American Ins. Co. (1970) 2 Cal.3d 192, 84 Cal.Rptr. 705, 465 P.2d 841; Huggins v. Yoshiwara (1970) 2 Cal.3d 200, 84 Cal.Rptr. 709, 465 P.2d 845, and State Farm Mutual Auto[*530] mobile Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co. (1970) 9 Cal.App.3d 508, 88 Cal.Rptr. 246.

It is ordered that the judgment is reversed and the case remanded with instructions to the district court to enter a judgment in favor of appellant.