Guilford Dinsmuir Shaw v. Peter Pitchess, Sheriff of Los Angeles Cnty., 440 F.2d 412 (9th Cir. 1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Guilford Dinsmuir Shaw v. Peter Pitchess, Sheriff of Los Angeles Cnty., 440 F.2d 412 (9th Cir. 1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Miller v. Commissioner (tax, 1973-12-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Miller v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See James River Apartments, Inc., 54 T.C. 618 (1970) , affd. per curiam 440 F.2d 412 (C.A. 4, 1971) and section 1.1033(a)-2(c) (2), Income Tax Regs.
cited Cited "see" Au Hoy v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See sec. 1.1033(a)-2(c)(2), Income Tax Regs. and James River Apartments, Inc ., 54 T.C. 618 (1970) , affirmed per curiam 440 F. 2d 412 ↩ (C.A. 4, 1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Guilford Dinsmuir SHAW, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Peter PITCHESS, Sheriff of Los Angeles County, Respondent-Appellee
25511.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Apr 20, 1971.
440 F.2d 412
Roger S. Hanson (argued), I. A. Kanarek, Van Nuys, Cal., for appellant., Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., John D. Maharg, County Counsel, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Wright, Carter, Trask.
Published
PER CURIAM:

Appellant was found guilty and sentenced for the crime of oral copulation in violation of California Penal Code,[*413] § 288a. The state Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction in an unreported decision. Certiorari was denied by the United States Supreme Court, Shaw v. California 395 U.S. 211, 89 S.Ct. 1772, 23 L.Ed.2d 213 (1969).

Appellant then petitioned for writ of habeas corpus in the district court below. The district court found no factual issues were involved, no evidentiary hearing was required and that the state courts had adequately disposed of the matter. The district court denied relief in an order entered on November 26, 1969, and incorporated much of the text of the unreported opinion of the state Court of Appeals.

On the basis of the district court’s order in Shaw v. Pitchess, (C.D.Cal. 1969) 324 F.Supp. 781, we affirm.