United States v. Larry Locklear, 445 F.2d 1406 (4th Cir. 1971). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Larry Locklear, 445 F.2d 1406 (4th Cir. 1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Larry LOCKLEAR, Appellant
71-1221_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Sep 1, 1971.
445 F.2d 1406
Philip A. Diehl, Raeford, N. C., on the brief for appellant., Williams L. Osteen, U. S. Atty., on the brief for appellee.
Haynsworth, Butzner, Russell.
Published
PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted of bank robbery by a jury in the district court. In this appeal he asserts that the evidence was insufficient to submit the issue to the jury, and that the verdict of the jury was contrary to all the evidence.

An examination of the briefs of the parties and the record shows that although it was circumstantial, there was “clearly sufficient evidence from which a reasonable mind might fairly conclude guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” Johnson v. United States, 265 F.2d 496, 497 (4th Cir. 1959).

Accordingly, we dispense with oral argument and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed.