No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Thomas Leonard O’BRIEN, Appellant
v.
Thomas Leonard O’BRIEN, Appellant
26643.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Oct 21, 1971.
448 F.2d 643
Michael E. Somers (argued), of Som-ers, Fox & Kallen, Santa Monica, Cal., for appellant., Andrew R. Willing, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Crim. Div., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Barnes, Ely, Per Curiam, Solomon.
Published
PER CURIAM:
O’Brien was convicted for his refusal of induction into the Armed Forces, in violation of 50 U.S.C.App. § 462. On appeal, O’Brien makes numerous claims, only one of which may have been thought to have possible merit. This is the contention that the State Selective Service Director had authorized a reopening of O’Brien’s late-matured conscientious objector claim in a letter recommending[*644] that the local board follow Local Board Memorandum No. 41 and grant O’Brien a “courtesy interview.” However, this argument was recently resolved, adversely to O’Brien’s position, in United States v. Wood, 446 F.2d 505, 506 n. 1 (9th Cir. 1971).
Affirmed.