Donald Doxzen v. Dir. of Patuxent Inst., 448 F.2d 786 (4th Cir. 1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Donald Doxzen v. Dir. of Patuxent Inst., 448 F.2d 786 (4th Cir. 1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Donald DOXZEN, Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION, Appellee
13291.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Oct 19, 1971.
Published opinion
448 F.2d 786
Richard L. Bazelon, Philadelphia, Pa. (Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish, Levy & Coleman, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant., Alfred J. O’Ferrall, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Maryland (Francis B. Burch, Atty. Gen., of Maryland, on the brief), for appellee.
Boreman, Craven, Per Curiam, Russell.
Published
PER CURIAM:

This appeal, assailing the constitutional validity of procedure under Article 31B, §§ 5 and 7(a), Annotated Code of Maryland, raises issues similar to those disposed of in Sas v. State of Maryland (CA 4, 1964) 334 F.2d 506, and Tippett v. State of Maryland (CA 4, 1971) 436 F.2d 1153. On the authority of those decisions, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.