neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
published
0.2 score
Cited for
No citing cases on record.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
William Joseph LENAHAN, Defendant-Appellant
v.
William Joseph LENAHAN, Defendant-Appellant
71-2191.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Apr 14, 1972.
Published opinion
J. David Franklin (argued), San Diego, Cal., James D. Riddet (argued), George H. Chula, Jr., Santa Ana, Cal., for defendant-appellant., James W. Brannigan, Jr. (argued), Brian E. Michaels, Stephen G. Nelson, Asst. U. S. Attys., Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Merrill, Goodwin, Whelan.
Published
PER CURIAM:
In our view the colloquy occurring in the presence of the jury, which was the basis for appellant’s motion for mistrial, required the granting of that motion in light of the factual issues which the case presented to the jury.
Other errors assigned we find to be without merit.
Reversed and remanded for new trial.