United States v. Jesus Diaz-Rojas, 457 F.2d 797 (9th Cir. 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Jesus Diaz-Rojas, 457 F.2d 797 (9th Cir. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Cho v. Commissioner (tax, 1976-10-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Cho v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
Seth Horne, 59 T.C. 319 , 336 (1972) , affd. 523 F. 2d 1363 (9th Cir. 1975) ; see Oddee Smith, 55 T.C. 260 , 267 (1970) , vacated and remanded 457 F. 2d 797 (5th Cir. 1972) (for reconsideration in light of United States v. Generes, 405 U.S. 93 (1972)) , opinion on remand 60 T.C. 316 (1973) ; W.
discussed Cited "see" Iden v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oddee Smith, 55 T.C. 260 (1970) , vacated and remanded, per curiam, [for a redetermination of the proximity of the relationship under Generes ] 457 F.2d 797 (C.A. 5, 1972), and Oddee Smith, 60 T.C. 316 ↩ (1973) . 6.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jesus DIAZ-ROJAS, Appellant
71-1677.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Mar 6, 1972.
457 F.2d 797
Richard S. Henderson, San Diego, Cal., for appellant., Michael Quinton, Brian E. Michaels, Asst. U. S. Attys., Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Stephen G. Nelson, Asst. U. S. Atty. & Chief, Criminal Div., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Chambers, Wright, Byrne.
Published
PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction in this marijuana smuggling (plus receiving, concealing and facilitating) case is affirmed.

[*798] The district court could and did properly find that the search was consented to by all of the interested parties.

The lesser included offense point has no merit. United States v. Johnston, 440 F.2d 389 (9 Cir. 1971).

The defendant-appellant can present his point on sentencing by a motion in the trial court under Rule 35, F.R.Cr.P. The mandate will issue now.