Big Three Indus. Gas & Equip. Co. v. United States, 459 F.2d 1042 (5th Cir. 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Big Three Indus. Gas & Equip. Co. v. United States, 459 F.2d 1042 (5th Cir. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Halliburton Co. v. United States (txnd, 1985-04-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Halliburton Co. v. United States
N.D. Tex. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Big Three Industrial Gas & Equipment Co. v. United States, 329 F.Supp. 1273 (S.D.Tex.1971) aff'd per curiam 459 F.2d 1042 (5th Cir.1972); Otis Engineering Corp. v. United States, 376 F.Supp. 109 (N.D.Tex.1974); Stafford Well Service, Inc. v. United States, 340 F.Supp. 657 (D.Wyo.1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Big Three Industrial Gas & Equipment Company
v.
United States
71-2930.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jun 8, 1972.
459 F.2d 1042
1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9118
Published

459 F.2d 1042

72-1 USTC P 16,040

BIG THREE INDUSTRIAL GAS & EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 71-2930.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

June 8, 1972.

Howard A. Weinberger, Atty., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Dallas, Tex., Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, Virginia H. Gallagher, Attys., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Anthony J. P. Farris, U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., William A. Friedlander, Jane M. Edmisten, Attys., Tax Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., of counsel, for defendant-appellant.

Charles R. Vickery, Jr., Houston, Tex., Vickery & McConnell, Don Stocking, Arthur Slaughter, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before AINSWORTH, GODBOLD and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[*~1042–1043]1

The Government appeals from the District Court's judgment in favor of appellee Taxpayer. We affirm and adopt the opinion of the District Judge which is reported at 329 F.Supp. 1273.

2

Affirmed.