Remington Arms Co., Inc. v. United States, 461 F.2d 1268 (2d Cir. 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Remington Arms Co., Inc. v. United States, 461 F.2d 1268 (2d Cir. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: American Honda Motor Co. v. Vickers Motors, Inc. (tnwd, 1974-06-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" American Honda Motor Co. v. Vickers Motors, Inc.
W.D. Tenn. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Noorlander v. Ciccone, 489 F.2d 642, 646 (8th Cir. 1973) wherein the court pointed out that the final indication of legislative intent in adopting 28 U.S.C. § 636 in mentioning three categories of functions assignable to magistrates (including assistance in discovery proceedings) was “to illustrate the general character of duties assignable to magistrates under the act, rather than to constitute an exclusive specification of duties so assignable.” See also Remington Arms Co. v. United States, 461 F.2d 1268 (2nd Cir. 1972) and Givens v. W.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Remington Arms Company, Inc.
v.
United States
722.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jul 18, 1972.
461 F.2d 1268
1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8345
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

461 F.2d 1268

72-2 USTC P 16,066

REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 722, Docket 71-2188.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued June 28, 1972.
Decided July 18, 1972.

Gary R. Allen, Atty., Tax Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks and Richard W. Perkins, Attys., Tax Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., and Stewart H. Jones, U. S. Atty., New Haven, Conn., on the brief), for defendant-appellant.

Richard C. Pugh, New York City (Ronald A. Partnoy, Bridgeport, Conn., Roger W. Thomas, Stephen L. Cohen, and Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before MOORE, SMITH and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

We affirm the order and judgment of the District Court upon the well reasoned opinion of Arthur H. Latimer, United States Magistrate (D.Conn.1971), as approved and adopted by the District Court, Robert C. Zampano, District Judge.