United States v. Leonard McIntosh, 463 F.2d 250 (3d Cir. 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Leonard McIntosh, 463 F.2d 250 (3d Cir. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Darrell C. Baldwin (ca5, 1981-05-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Darrell C. Baldwin
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. McIntosh, 463 F.2d 250 (3rd Cir. 1972); United States v. Phillips, 427 F.2d 1035, 1037 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 867 , 91 S.Ct. 108 , 27 L.Ed.2d 106 (1970).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Paris Carney
3rd Cir. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. McIntosh, 463 F.2d 250 (3d Cir.1972); United States v. Abuhouran, 162 F.3d 230, 233 (3d Cir.1998) (existence of federal insurance was proven by testimony of bank employee and FDIC representative where juror would reasonably have understood the witnesses to refer to the time of the offenses charged); United States v. Rusan, 460 F.3d 989, 994 (8th Cir.2006) (photocopy of FDIC plaque and testimony of bank employee proved existence of federal insurance coverage); United States v. Hicks, 217 F.3d 1038, 1044-45 (9th Cir.2000) (testimony of bank employee that bank was fede…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Regan DARRELL, Defendant-Appellant
10th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. McIntosh, 463 F.2d 250 (3d Cir.1972) (per curiam) (unchallenged testimony by bank’s assistant vice-president that he was custodian of bank’s charter and that on date of robbery the bank was insured held sufficient); United States v. Phillips, 606 F.2d 884, 887 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1024 , 100 S.Ct. 685 , 62 L.Ed.2d 657 (1980) (“uncontradicted testimony of a ranking official of the institution is sufficient to establish that the institution is federally insured”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Leonard McINTOSH, Appellant
72-1323.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jul 3, 1972.
463 F.2d 250
1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8622
William C. Bradley, Jr., Aerenson, Balick & Balick, Wilmington, Del., for appellant., Norman Levine, Asst. U. S. Atty., Wilmingon, Del., for appellee.
Aldisert, Rosen, Hunter.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

Found guilty by a jury of robbing the Delaware Trust Company, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), appellant raises as the sole question on this appeal that the government failed to produce sufficient evidence that the bank was insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a crucial element of the crime charged. At trial, the Assistant Vice-President and Manager of the Wilmington Office of the Delaware Trust Company testified that he was custodian of the charters of the bank, and that on the critical date, March 14, 1969, the bank was a member of the F.D.I.C. His testimony was not contradicted.

We hold that the uncontradicted testimony was sufficient to sustain the government’s burden. United States v. Phillips, 427 F.2d 1035, 1037 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 867, 91 S.Ct. 108, 27 L.Ed.2d 106 (1970); United States v. Safley, 408 F.2d 603, 605 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 983, 89 S.Ct. 2147, 23 L.Ed.2d 772 (1969).

The judgment of conviction will be affirmed.