in Re: John Wesley Patterson, 418 S.W.3d 336 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2013). · Go Syfert
in Re: John Wesley Patterson, 418 S.W.3d 336 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
48 citation events (48 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014 2020 2026
Cited for
At page 341 inmate required to file additional affidavit of previous filings in appellate court2 citing cases1 citing court put it this way
  • Foster v. West, 514 S.W.3d 887 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2017).
    See Ex parte Alvarado, No. 13-16-00514-CV, 2016 WL 6520179 , at *1 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi Nov. 3, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing appeal for same reason); Dunsmore v. Barrow, No. 14-15-00572-CV, 2015 WL 7258506 , at *2 (Tex. App.-…
  • Bradley J. Barton v. Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin & William Jones, No. 10-21-00098-CV (Tex. App.—Waco Nov. 10, 2021).
    (inmate required to file additional affidavit of previous filings in appellate court)
At page 339 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Senrick Wilkerson v. Ramsey 1 Unit, No. 01-14-00790-CV (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 21, 2015).
    “When an inmate litigant files an affidavit or unsworn declaration of inability to pay costs, Chapter 14 requires the inmate to file an additional affidavit or declaration setting forth specific details on all previous actions filed pro se…
At page 340 When an inmate does not provide a complete affidavit of previous filings, ‘the trial court is entitled to assume the [current action] is substantially similar to one previously filed by the inmate, and therefore, frivolous.’ ” (alteration in original1 citing case1 citing court put it this way
  • John E. Rodarte v. Beneficial Texas, Inc., 482 S.W.3d 246 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2015).
    (When an inmate does not provide a complete affidavit of previous filings, ‘the trial court is entitled to assume the [current action] is substantially similar to one previously filed by the inmate, and therefore, frivo…)
Other citing cases11 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Show 1 more citing case
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re John Wesley PATTERSON, Relator
05-13-01534-CV.
Court of Appeals of Texas.
Dec 2, 2013.
418 S.W.3d 336
2013 WL 6229533
2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 14588
John Patterson, pro se., Greg Willis, Collin County Dist. Atty., McKinney, for real party in interest.
Fitzgerald, Lang, Myers.
Published

OPINION

Opinion by Justice FITZGERALD.

Relator contends the trial court violated a ministerial duty by not following a prior order of this Court. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a); Simon v. Levarlo, 306 S.W.3d 318, 320-21 (Tex. Crim.App.2009) (orig. proceeding); State of Tex. ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim.App.2001) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.