Mrs. Linda NEWMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee, 475 F.2d 768 (5th Cir. 1973). · Go Syfert
Mrs. Linda NEWMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee, 475 F.2d 768 (5th Cir. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Cited for
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
5 Fair empl.prac.cas. 847, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8500 Mrs. Linda Newmon
v.
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
72-2966.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 5, 1973.
Published opinion
475 F.2d 768
1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11319
Howard Moore, Jr., Elizabeth R. Rindskopf, Atlanta, Ga., Jack Greenberg, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant., Dean Booth, Michael C. Murphy, Atlanta, Ga., Sidney F. Davis, Legal Div. Delta Air Lines, Inc., Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellee., Rita Page Reuss, Cleveland, Ohio, Vivian T. Kelsey, Berea, Ohio, for Women’s Law Fund, Inc., amicus curiae..
Brown, Wisdom, Ainsworth.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the denial of a preliminary injunction in which Mrs. Newmon alleges that Delta Air Lines’ maternity leave policy violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S. C.A. § 2000e], and that as a result of that policy she suffered a loss of employee benefits including the right to reinstatement in her job at the end of the prescribed period subsequent to the birth of her child.

The record reflects that the trial court considered the importance of this question in light of the medical and industrial factors involved and concluded that the relief should await hearing on the merits. Upon applying the usual standard, we find no abuse of discretion.[*769] Johnson v. Radford, 5 Cir., 1971, 449 F.2d 115; Southern Petroleum Corp. v. Harper, 5 Cir., 1960, 73 F.2d 715.

As this is a recurring problem of great importance, we feel that the case should be remanded forthwith for trial without delay under a high priority.

Affirmed.