H. E. Juelich v. United States, 475 F.2d 788 (5th Cir. 1973). · Go Syfert
Search
H. E. Juelich v. United States, 475 F.2d 788 (5th Cir. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
35 citation events across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Connell v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. (alnd, 1983-03-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Connell v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. (2×)
N.D. Ala. · 1983 · confidence medium
Co. v. White, 475 F.2d 788, 793 (5th Cir.1973).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.
S.D. Tex. · 1983 · confidence medium
Co. v. White, 475 F.2d 788, 793-94 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1040 , 94 S.Ct. 542 , 38 L.Ed.2d 331 (1973); Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. Chemtronics, Inc., 428 F.2d 555, 560 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 956 , 91 S.Ct. 353 , 27 L.Ed.2d 264 (1970).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) A. B. Baumstimler v. Bueford B. Rankin, Kenneth J. Laughlin
5th Cir. · 1982 · confidence medium
See Arbrook, Inc. v. American Hospital Supply Corp., 645 F.2d 273 , 276 n.1 (5th Cir. 1981); Ludlow Corp. v. Textile Rubber & Chemical Co., 636 F.2d 1057, 1059 (5th Cir. 1981); Continental Oil Co. v. Cole, 634 F.2d 188, 195 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 830 , 102 S.Ct. 124 , 70 L.Ed.2d 106 (1981); John Zink Co. v. National Airoil Burner Co., 613 F.2d 547, 551 (5th Cir. 1980); Harrington Manufacturing Co. v. White, 475 F.2d 788, 793-94 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1040 , 94 S.Ct. 542 , 38 L.Ed.2d 331 (1973); Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. Chemtronics, Inc., 428 F.2d 555, 560 (5th Cir.)…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Tri-Collar, Inc. v. Reamco, Inc.
W.D. La. · 1982 · confidence medium
Harrington Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. White, 475 F.2d 788, 796 (5th Cir. 1973), and with this principle of claim construction in mind, the Court, in examining the patent claims, will construe them narrowly so as to avoid the prior art to the extent that such a construction can be reasonably adopted.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh, as Trustee for the Max-Planck-Institut Fur Kohlenforschung v. Eastman Kodak Company
5th Cir. · 1980 · confidence medium
Barwick Industries, Inc., 551 F.2d at 629 n. 19; Ziegler v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 483 F.2d at 867 ; Harrington Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. White, 475 F.2d 788, 796 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1040 , 94 S.Ct. 542 , 38 L.Ed.2d 331 (1973).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Rountree v. Varco International, Inc.
S.D. Tex. · 1978 · confidence medium
Ziegler v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 483 F.2d 858, 868 (5th Cir. 1973); Harrington Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. White, 475 F.2d 788, 796 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1040 , 94 S.Ct. 542 , 38 L.Ed.2d 331 (1973); Marvin Glass & Associates v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, 448 F.2d 60, 61 (5th Cir. 1971).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Nationwide Chemical Corp. v. Wright
M.D. Fla. · 1976 · confidence medium
Harrington Manufacturing Co. v. White, 475 F.2d 788, 793-794 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied 414 U.S. 1040 , 94 S.Ct. 542 , 38 L.Ed.2d 331 ; Ingersoll-Rand Company v. Brunner & Lay, 474 F.2d 491, 496 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied 414 U.S. 865 , 94 S.Ct. 125 , 38 L.Ed.2d 117 ; Van Gorp Manufacturing, Inc. v. Townley Industrial Plastics, Inc., 464 F.2d 16, 17 (5th Cir. 1972); Stamicarbon N.V. v. Escambia Chemical Corporation, 430 F.2d 920, 924-925 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied 400 U.S. 944 , 91 S.Ct. 245 , 27 L.Ed.2d 248 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Borden, Inc. v. Occidental Petroleum Corporation
S.D. Tex. · 1974 · confidence medium
Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 12 , 86 S.Ct. 684, 691 , 15 L.Ed.2d 545, 553 (1966); Harrington Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. White, 475 F.2d 788, 794 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1040 , 94 S.Ct. 542 , 38 L.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Banning v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
S.D. Tex. · 1974 · confidence medium
See, e. g., Ziegler v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 483 F.2d 858, 868 (5th Cir. 1973); Harrington Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. White, 475 F.2d 788, 796 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1040 , 94 S.Ct. 542 , 38 L.Ed.2d 331 (1973); Marvin Glass & Associates v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, 448 F.2d 60, 61 (5th Cir. 1971); Fraser v. City of San Antonio, Texas, 430 F.2d 1218, 1221 (5th Cir. 1970); Sterner Lighting, Inc. v. Allied Electrical Supply, Inc., 431 F.2d 539, 543 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 909 , 91 S.Ct. 869 , 27 L.Ed.2d 807 (1971). 12.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) White v. Mar-Bel, Inc.
M.D. Fla. · 1973 · confidence medium
E. g., Hobbs v. United States Atomic Energy Commission, 451 F.2d 849, 856 (5th Cir. 1971); Ingersoll-Rand Company v. Brunner & Lay, Inc., 474 F.2d 491, 496 (5th Cir. 1973); Harrington Manufacturing Co. v. White, 475 F.2d 788, 793-794 (5th Cir. 1973).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Sauquoit Fibers Co. v. Leesona Corp.
S.D. Fla. · 1973 · confidence medium
Co., Inc. v. White, 475 F.2d 788, 793 (5th Cir. 1973) and Railex Corp. v. Speed Check Co., 457 F.2d 1040 (5th Cir. 1972). .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation
S.D. Fla. · 1973 · confidence medium
Co., Inc. v. White, 475 F.2d 788, 793 (5th Cir. 1973) and Railex Corp. v. Speed Check Co., 457 F.2d 1040 (5th Cir. 1972). [15] Exhibit 3 to Sauquoit Fibers Motion for Partial Summary Judgment at 17. [hereinafter referred to as Sauquoit Exhibit] [16] Sauquoit Exhibit at 11. [17] Sauquoit Exhibit at 21. [18] Exchequer Opinion at 30-31. [19] Memorandum of Points And Authorities In Support of New York Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment at 16. [20] The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has remarked recently that "[a] bona fide experimental use involves no commercial exploitation." Pickering v. Ho…
cited Cited "see" Layne-New York Co., Inc. v. Allied Asphalt Co., Inc.
W.D. Pa. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harrington Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. White, 475 F.2d 788 (5th Cir. 1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
H. E. JUELICH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
72-3530.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 22, 1973.
475 F.2d 788
H. E. Juelich, pro se., Charles S. White-Spunner, U. S. Atty., Irwin W. Coleman, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., for defendant-appellee.
Thornberry, Goldberg, Roney.
Published
PER CURIAM:

Petitioner, Herbert E. Juelich, appeals from the District Court’s denial of his motion to vacate sentence, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We find that' petitioner’s contention, that his constitutional right to due process was denied when evidence stemming directly from an “illegal” autopsy was admitted at his trial, was considered and ruled upon in 1963 at an evidentiary hearing held pursuant to an earlier § 2255 motion. At that time, the District Judge rejected petitioner’s contention, and we affirmed, Juelich v. United States, 5 Cir. 1965, 342 F.2d 29, 31. [1] The District Court correctly rejected petitioner’s motion without holding an evidentiary hearing because petitioner is seeking relief previously sought under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the same grounds previously raised and decided against him. Dryden v. United States, 5 Cir. 1972, 455 F.2d 491; Owens v. United States, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 1173. We affirm.

Affirmed.

1

. See the quotation from the transcript of the 1963 evidentiary hearing in Juelich v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 403 F.2d 523. 525.